SPS餵食
- 主題發起人 Billylin
- 開始日期
- 關注者 1
我沒有甚麼 SPS 經驗, 再請其他大大補充吧
http://www.liveaquaria.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=597+322+745&pcatid=745
A 系列的
Acropora corals receive a majority of their nutritional requirements from photosynthesis, but will benefit from the addition of various types of phyto and zooplankton.
A 系列珊瑚大多數養分可由光合作用攝取, 但是餵食微藻或是浮游生物對珊瑚有益.
如 Phyto Fest/Roti Fest/海洋之花
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=02-9000-10
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=02-9001-10
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=04-1916-01
我的話就有想到才餵, 一星期一茶匙吧. 供您參考
http://www.liveaquaria.com/product/prod_display.cfm?c=597+322+745&pcatid=745
A 系列的
Acropora corals receive a majority of their nutritional requirements from photosynthesis, but will benefit from the addition of various types of phyto and zooplankton.
A 系列珊瑚大多數養分可由光合作用攝取, 但是餵食微藻或是浮游生物對珊瑚有益.
如 Phyto Fest/Roti Fest/海洋之花
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=02-9000-10
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=02-9001-10
http://www.vividaquariums.com/10Expand.asp?ProductCode=04-1916-01
我的話就有想到才餵, 一星期一茶匙吧. 供您參考
小弟個人的心得啦..
用測試劑去測..如果硝酸~磷酸鹽都極低(好比兩個都接近0)
sps的顏色又很淡~共肉又很薄~水螅體越養越小~就該餵食了..
餵食方法=餵魚
養幾隻魚~把魚餵飽飽的..魚會便便
便便可營養了!
不是我胡扯喔..
不久前在國外線上雜誌看到內容提到"sps不需要浮游生物"的文章
rc不久前的每月一缸也是只餵魚~不餵軟體飼料的!
小弟個人也在增加魚隻餵食頻率後
顏色淡~共肉薄~水息體小的sps~都有顯著的改善
魚也變得肥肥胖胖!
不過前提是水中營養鹽要夠低喔~蛋白要夠強喔!
用測試劑去測..如果硝酸~磷酸鹽都極低(好比兩個都接近0)
sps的顏色又很淡~共肉又很薄~水螅體越養越小~就該餵食了..
餵食方法=餵魚
養幾隻魚~把魚餵飽飽的..魚會便便
便便可營養了!
不是我胡扯喔..
不久前在國外線上雜誌看到內容提到"sps不需要浮游生物"的文章
rc不久前的每月一缸也是只餵魚~不餵軟體飼料的!
小弟個人也在增加魚隻餵食頻率後
顏色淡~共肉薄~水息體小的sps~都有顯著的改善
魚也變得肥肥胖胖!
不過前提是水中營養鹽要夠低喔~蛋白要夠強喔!
[FONT=新細明體]小弟想要表達的是[/FONT]~
[FONT=新細明體]藉由魚隻的排泄物保持水中適當的營養鹽[/FONT]
Sps[FONT=新細明體]就足以滋養維生了[/FONT]![FONT=新細明體]並且養了魚又養了軟體[/FONT]~
[FONT=新細明體]至於便便有多營養[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]個人認為除了氮磷廢物外[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]礦物質[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]胺基酸有的沒的應該也是很充沛[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]那為什麼蛋白要強一點[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]這就像買保險一樣[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]大一點比較安心[/FONT]~
[FONT=新細明體]以上純屬個人見解[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]參考參考就好囉[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]藉由魚隻的排泄物保持水中適當的營養鹽[/FONT]
Sps[FONT=新細明體]就足以滋養維生了[/FONT]![FONT=新細明體]並且養了魚又養了軟體[/FONT]~
[FONT=新細明體]至於便便有多營養[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]個人認為除了氮磷廢物外[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]礦物質[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]胺基酸有的沒的應該也是很充沛[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]那為什麼蛋白要強一點[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]這就像買保險一樣[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]大一點比較安心[/FONT]~
[FONT=新細明體]以上純屬個人見解[/FONT]~[FONT=新細明體]參考參考就好囉[/FONT]
可以參考這兩篇算是很新的tank of the month
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index.php/current-issue/article/50-tank-of-the-month
I believe my fish make a highly beneficial contribution to coral feeding and health, thanks to their detritus.
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index.php/current-issue/article/55-tank-of-the-month
I very rarely feed my corals. After trying several methods and coral foods, I came to the conclusion that, in my tank, which is well stocked with fishes, target feeding of corals is useless. I believe that the fishes' waste itself feeds the whole benthonic and planktonic chain, and this benthos and plankton is what feeds my corals. I feed my fishes once a day with crumbles or flakes in large quantities, and that’s it. If I notice any signs of starving in the corals, I add a bit of Golden Pearls or other liquid food specifically designed for corals.
這篇很有趣!
http://www.coralmagazine-us.com/content/what-corals-eat
One of the first things that had to be done was to verify that there actually was nothing for the corals to eat. By the late 1950s, the waters around coral reefs had been sampled in many parts of the world, and the plankton that researchers thought could have been coral food was nowhere to be found.
Note the chain of events here: First, the plankton in the waters around reefs appeared to be insufficient to feed all the corals. Second, it was discovered that the zooxanthellae found in corals produced all the basic carbon compounds that their hosts needed. Third, somehow the statement “Zooxanthellae can produce 100 percent of the carbon, or sugar, required by corals” morphed into “Zooxanthellae can produce 100 percent of the nutritional needs of corals.” Finally, the conclusion was arrived at: “Corals do not need to feed.” Just shine bright sunlight on them, the conventional wisdom said, and their zooxanthellae would produce all the food the corals could use.
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index.php/current-issue/article/50-tank-of-the-month
I believe my fish make a highly beneficial contribution to coral feeding and health, thanks to their detritus.
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index.php/current-issue/article/55-tank-of-the-month
I very rarely feed my corals. After trying several methods and coral foods, I came to the conclusion that, in my tank, which is well stocked with fishes, target feeding of corals is useless. I believe that the fishes' waste itself feeds the whole benthonic and planktonic chain, and this benthos and plankton is what feeds my corals. I feed my fishes once a day with crumbles or flakes in large quantities, and that’s it. If I notice any signs of starving in the corals, I add a bit of Golden Pearls or other liquid food specifically designed for corals.
這篇很有趣!
http://www.coralmagazine-us.com/content/what-corals-eat
One of the first things that had to be done was to verify that there actually was nothing for the corals to eat. By the late 1950s, the waters around coral reefs had been sampled in many parts of the world, and the plankton that researchers thought could have been coral food was nowhere to be found.
Note the chain of events here: First, the plankton in the waters around reefs appeared to be insufficient to feed all the corals. Second, it was discovered that the zooxanthellae found in corals produced all the basic carbon compounds that their hosts needed. Third, somehow the statement “Zooxanthellae can produce 100 percent of the carbon, or sugar, required by corals” morphed into “Zooxanthellae can produce 100 percent of the nutritional needs of corals.” Finally, the conclusion was arrived at: “Corals do not need to feed.” Just shine bright sunlight on them, the conventional wisdom said, and their zooxanthellae would produce all the food the corals could use.
最後編輯：
never-change
🏆🏆🏆🏅
絕大部分珊瑚是扮演生態的生產者,也可把它當成水質過濾的生物,並不是像消費者的弱肉強食圈.
故如何平衡缸中的腐物與營養鹽,這才是提供珊瑚食物的重點.
而強制餵食到珊瑚的口器,小弟一直不太建議使用.當然人類直想用最迅速的簡便方法,來獲取單向的報籌利益.但往往卻要付出額外的代價,就如同小小的海水生態缸.高密度的消費者魚群.高餵食.高污染後,接著需大量換水.換棉.與大電力的水流.蛋白等設備付出.是否符合利益.值得探討.
ps:所以小弟較窮勒不換水.且常將家中冰箱不用的食物.小小加個工分個類,請珊瑚幫我分解它.
爽叨好.
但是降水溫.與高照度光源,還是無法克服
故如何平衡缸中的腐物與營養鹽,這才是提供珊瑚食物的重點.
而強制餵食到珊瑚的口器,小弟一直不太建議使用.當然人類直想用最迅速的簡便方法,來獲取單向的報籌利益.但往往卻要付出額外的代價,就如同小小的海水生態缸.高密度的消費者魚群.高餵食.高污染後,接著需大量換水.換棉.與大電力的水流.蛋白等設備付出.是否符合利益.值得探討.
ps:所以小弟較窮勒不換水.且常將家中冰箱不用的食物.小小加個工分個類,請珊瑚幫我分解它.
爽叨好.但是降水溫.與高照度光源,還是無法克服
