A
Andrew
訪客
中譯 Andrew 的"如何判斷 skimmer 是否夠用"
其實這篇文章是可以用來參考,
COB, yes, this is for reference only.
但事實上還牽涉到很多問題,
These calculation methods are actually utilized in preventing generalization measurement used by skimmer manufacturers (for example, the skimmer is good for tank up to 100G?)
skimmer設計,
I disagree with this part. All skimmers are utilizing the same concept. Weather if the skimmer is built with venturi? Needle wheel? Downdraft? Air driven? The all use the air and water mixing concept to produce the finest air bubble to prolong the contact time in order to lift the organic waste effectively. Perhaps you should rephrase it to the size or water processing capcity of the skimmer.
調整
Yes, this is one of the most important point I tried to convey. A larger skimmer would give you the "ability" to adjust so its processing power can be tune down by regulating the water pump. And this is why I suggested one should get a bigger one rather than a smaller version.
生物的數目;大小;種類;餵食習慣,都會影響到有機物產生速度和數量,
The calculation methods are based on the loaded tank capacity of hobbyist choice. In my example, 120G, ten Acros, 10 fishes ranging from 2" to 8". I am reaching the capacity "I" feel needing more skimming in order to provide qualitative water parameter. This could very well be someone who has a smaller tank with loaded animals as well. On the other hand, could a tank be over skimmed remains a myth still today. In your example a 500L tank with one 10cm fish in my opinion does not conclude anything. Using an efficient skimmer is merely for the future benefits of your water parameter for your priceless collection.
Again, this is the reason why I brought this up. Any equipment you planning on to get should be planned carefully for the future sake. You should try to see yourself a year from now and think if the equipment acquired is suitable or not. My case is that I did not see myself with the current capacity and under estimates the ecosystem I created in my 120G. And that is why I am again purchasing something that could be prevented if I planned this carefully PRIOR.
For Arthur:
Andrew,
仔細看過, 才發現你那 ETSS 非常小 (66cm 高)
Hehehe, small but massive and powerful.
卻有 1000GPH (3785L/H) 的處理量
That is the way I like it.hey hey hey!!!
我一直以為大缸子旁一定要有一隻高高的 Skimmer 才能應付的了
Nop, the technology is getting better and better everyday. The turbofolotor "shorty" is shorter than the one I got but process 1300 gallon per hour. ETSS 800 has 2 processing towers working in conjunction. Can't wait for it to come. LOL!!!
看到這個才知道, 只要有底櫃就可以了
Isn’t this wonderful, Arthur???
98% efficiency 真是太高了
Again, this is just based on calculation. My fish could La du du and produced more waste or my tank could spawn again where the sperm and eggs produced could very well influence the functionality of this baby. 98% is the most optimal efficiency calculated based on the provided methods but as long as the efficiency is not going to fall below 90% I will consider COOL!!! LOL!!! Once again, thanx Arthur and I will let others know how my baby worked.
其實這篇文章是可以用來參考,
COB, yes, this is for reference only.
但事實上還牽涉到很多問題,
These calculation methods are actually utilized in preventing generalization measurement used by skimmer manufacturers (for example, the skimmer is good for tank up to 100G?)
skimmer設計,
I disagree with this part. All skimmers are utilizing the same concept. Weather if the skimmer is built with venturi? Needle wheel? Downdraft? Air driven? The all use the air and water mixing concept to produce the finest air bubble to prolong the contact time in order to lift the organic waste effectively. Perhaps you should rephrase it to the size or water processing capcity of the skimmer.
調整
Yes, this is one of the most important point I tried to convey. A larger skimmer would give you the "ability" to adjust so its processing power can be tune down by regulating the water pump. And this is why I suggested one should get a bigger one rather than a smaller version.
生物的數目;大小;種類;餵食習慣,都會影響到有機物產生速度和數量,
The calculation methods are based on the loaded tank capacity of hobbyist choice. In my example, 120G, ten Acros, 10 fishes ranging from 2" to 8". I am reaching the capacity "I" feel needing more skimming in order to provide qualitative water parameter. This could very well be someone who has a smaller tank with loaded animals as well. On the other hand, could a tank be over skimmed remains a myth still today. In your example a 500L tank with one 10cm fish in my opinion does not conclude anything. Using an efficient skimmer is merely for the future benefits of your water parameter for your priceless collection.
Again, this is the reason why I brought this up. Any equipment you planning on to get should be planned carefully for the future sake. You should try to see yourself a year from now and think if the equipment acquired is suitable or not. My case is that I did not see myself with the current capacity and under estimates the ecosystem I created in my 120G. And that is why I am again purchasing something that could be prevented if I planned this carefully PRIOR.
For Arthur:
Andrew,
仔細看過, 才發現你那 ETSS 非常小 (66cm 高)
Hehehe, small but massive and powerful.
卻有 1000GPH (3785L/H) 的處理量
That is the way I like it.hey hey hey!!!
我一直以為大缸子旁一定要有一隻高高的 Skimmer 才能應付的了
Nop, the technology is getting better and better everyday. The turbofolotor "shorty" is shorter than the one I got but process 1300 gallon per hour. ETSS 800 has 2 processing towers working in conjunction. Can't wait for it to come. LOL!!!
看到這個才知道, 只要有底櫃就可以了
Isn’t this wonderful, Arthur???
98% efficiency 真是太高了
Again, this is just based on calculation. My fish could La du du and produced more waste or my tank could spawn again where the sperm and eggs produced could very well influence the functionality of this baby. 98% is the most optimal efficiency calculated based on the provided methods but as long as the efficiency is not going to fall below 90% I will consider COOL!!! LOL!!! Once again, thanx Arthur and I will let others know how my baby worked.
