[FONT=新細明體][FONT=新細明體][/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體][FONT=新細明體]同濟大學發表論文,稻殼作為反硝化物質,快速降低硝酸鹽[/FONT][/FONT]





[FONT=新細明體][FONT=新細明體]原理如同最近流行的BioPellet,生化NP豆。但比NP豆要經濟實惠得多。誰敢一試?[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=新細明體]



[FONT=新細明體]In this research, rice husk, a lignocellulosic waste from agroindustry, was investigated as the sole carbon source as well as biofilm carrier in the biological denitrification of wastewater in up-flow laboratory reactors.An artificial wastewater with a temperature in the range of 27–33 ?C was used. Fast startup of the reactor and a high nitrate removal efficiency was observed. The highest rates of denitrification about 0.096 kg/m3 d were achieved when flow rate and nitrate concentration were 41.4 L/d and 25.0 mg/L, respectively.[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]作為純碳源的工業廢料:稻殼,通過[/FONT]​
[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體][FONT=新細明體]硝化[/FONT][FONT=新細明體]反應器,可以在常溫下,快[/FONT][FONT=新細明體]速降[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=新細明體][FONT=新細明體]低硝酸鹽。[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=新細明體]

[FONT=新細明體]Nitrite accumulation in treated water was practically zero during the experiments. Flow rate and nitrate concentration of the influent were observed to have a significant effect on nitrate removal efficiency. A very sharp decline was observed when the flow rate reached 30 L/d. The reactor had the ability to accommodate a wind range of pH(6.5–8.5) and DO(1.5–4). A time-dependent decrease in nitrate removal ratewas observed after 72 days of operation. And the addition of new rice husk brought about a rapid increase of the nitrate removal efficiency. The results showed that rice husk could be an economical and effective carbon source for the nitrate removal process.[/FONT]​

[FONT=新細明體]最終能達到0,水流對硝化起決定性作用,在水流約30L/d?(不懂這個單位)時,作用非常明顯,約72小時左右能起明顯效果。[/FONT]
[FONT=新細明體]稻殼是最經濟實惠的反硝碳源[/FONT][/FONT]​

http://www.aquayee.com/discuz/thread-1948-1-1.html
 
這是在農業上處裡堆肥(禽,畜糞便)的方式
搜尋堆肥應該很多資料吧

不過在水族上好像沒有這樣用法
 
不知哪看到的
大陸的東西都黑心貨
也都很毒
不過毒藥是唯一黑心貨裡沒毒的
所以請安心使用(誤)

插個話,小弟看過一則笑話

大概是這樣的
有個人買啥東西都買到黑心的
到最後自己得了一身病,久病厭世,於是他就想買農藥自殺
結果他買了農藥喝下去後,難過得要死就是死不了
"x的,連農藥也是黑心的...."
 

相似主題